Wow I caused a semi ruckus. Maigh, sorry if I miss informed anyone about you or your site as a blogger. I would offer a humble apology. As for the Chuck D, well my last name starts with a B and it sometimes is confused with D and, well, it stuck as a nickname.
As for the Office Max gig, I run the Northern Colorado and Wyoming region for their commercial sales division, I never have to go into a store and I can sometimes take my bike with me so that when the day is done I can go for a spin before returning home or spending the night in someplace like Casper Wyoming. It's a cool gig, I do well at it and I get to meet a ton of people and have a nice time and see some places that I might never otherwise get to.
I am not trying to claim anything other than being me, a sort of in the know(another assumption) and mostly literate person who rides a bike and works a job like anyone else. On the link from Sager's site, the way it seemed to me, (thank you for correcting my assumption) and as I read the ever changing title it seemed to be a funny exchange between Sager and yourself. (Again another assumption on my part) it was never my intention to denigrate or tarnish you or your site.
I'll correct my assumptions, when I met Sager he was with the Durango crew at a bike race(s) and the assumption I made was that he was from there. My mistake. I mentioned to him on his site, I actually met him a few times at the races and that I liked his spot on the web. I have no clue of or about his life beyond Norba events. He was and is a nice guy and I appreciated the fact that a pro rider had the time and energy to gab with lower level riders and was impressed with him.
Glommed was a huge assumption and poor choice of words on my part, a truly poor choice of words, and that was a mistake. I should have done more due diligence before typing away. And then I should have thought twice and then skipped using it. I am sorry if that has been misinterpeted out there in the internet ether.
As for the confessions and secrets post, I did happen to find it interesting and it seemed that you found it interesting also. In no way was I trying to infer that you have or had secrets, it was an offhanded comment. In the future I will be careful in referring to or citing other sources in reference to other(s) blogs.
The "strange chick" comment was merely a comment on the random and insightful nature of your thoughts and posts. Certainly not an spiteful nor mean spirited dig against you. As for coping a line from you, I did not intend to do so, if I did, I will be sure to offer credit where credit is due.
On wanting to abuse Durango kids, well, they seem to do plenty of that to themselves at
http://www.durangosquawk.com/ and I was piling on some extra abuse. It was supposed to be all in fun and it was more a comment on the friendly (jokingly abusive) rivalry in place between Durango and Denver/Boulder riders. In addition please note that I've had "superiors" like that at work and I would be loathe to be that person if I was the "boss". That was a poor choice of words and was not very well thought out on my part.
If I did indeed cast the first stone, it has been gently thrown back and now I stand hat in hand properly chastised. At least I was able to allow you to exercise your writing chops on a fine Monday evening. Thanks for reading and for the chance to publicly correct my mistakes.